Poor quality of the coding will definitely lead to significant issues in the long run, and as a developer, it is important for people to make sure that they have to be very practical about the deadlines. Normally, it is in a rush to get things done as soon as possible. Structuring of the coding element is normally tempered by the individuals, and ultimately, this concept goes down in the list of priorities. So, it is important for people to note that there is no such definition for poor-quality coding because any quality piece of coding can be easily judged by some of the essential aspects, which have been explained as follows:
- Consistency and reliability: One must always prefer that particular coding element that is extremely reliable as well as very well documented in terms of understanding, reviewing, maintaining and understanding the basic things.
- Prediction, reliability, and robustness: High-quality coding elements will definitely be helpful in providing people with predictable application behaviour along with mitigation of the risks so that security lapses will be eliminated very well from the whole process.
- Maintainability with extensibility: It is important for people to go for that particular coding element, which will be helpful in improving the application functionality by including new features and ultimately providing people with the best level of support.
Any piece of coding element will be poor if it scores low on the above-mentioned points, which is the main reason that people need to have a good understanding of the reasons and factors associated with poor-quality coding with the help of experts like Appsealing:
- Culture of the team: If the ethics of the team are poor and the deadlines are impossible, then definitely this scenario will lead to the poor quality of the coding element in the long run, and the technical expertise will leave the development teams. This particular scenario will be based on creating a situation of technical debt, which could be problematic for the organisation to deal with.
- Weak quality assurance practises in the software development life-cycle: Whenever the organisations are not performing well in the cases of unit and manual testing, then people definitely need to ignore the importance of the coding review and automated testing in this case. This particular scenario will lead to this keeping of things just to meet the deadlines, and ultimately, the overall quality of the coding element will be extremely poor in the whole process.
- Using the incorrect architecture: It is always important for people to ensure that the architecture which they are implying should be very successful in terms of providing people with the best level of support and further things will be very well sorted out in terms of using the good fit for the development process and functional requirements. Your coding quality can result in not maintaining good practises, and further inconsistency can create a good number of issues with the documentation, cohesion, and repetition of the coding element.
Following are some of the best possible scenarios for improving the quality of the coding very successfully:
- Maintaining and following the consistent coding standards: Consistent coding standards will be all about improving the overall readability in such a manner that things will be very successful in reducing complexity and helping to promote flexibility. This will be helpful in making sure the technical debt-related situation is eliminated, and things are sorted out well with the help of maintaining the compatible and consistent class variables. Documents, classes and properties, in this case, will be helpful in providing people with clear and concise comments without any problem. Basically, creating the scenario of the complexity of methods will become easy and officiant in this case.
- Implementing the coding review: It is always important for the concerned organisations to shift the focus to the analysis and review of the coding element very consistently so that errors can be easily found right from the beginning. In this particular case, people definitely need to have a good understanding of the basics of the development phase so that everyone will be able to save a lot of time and further will be able to eliminate the complexity. If the project has the budget, then people definitely need to include manual testing as well. Further, to complete the montage of automated testing, using coding analysis tools is a great idea.
- It is important to give proper importance to the memory leak and buffer overflow issues: Memory leak and buffer overflow issues will definitely make the coding element extremely vulnerable to the attacks, and further, the threat agents in this particular case will be using the third-party tools to perform the static analysis. On the other hand, to ensure that things are very well sorted out without any hassle, people need to be clear about the size of the target buffer right from the beginning. This will provide people with a good number of benefits in terms of eliminating poor-quality coding, and ultimately, overall security will be top-notch without any problems.
Hence, ensuring the introduction of good-quality coding will definitely provide people with benefits in multiple ways and will further enable them to promote the concept of application security very easily. Hence, to eliminate poor application coding, everybody should focus on addressing the issues as soon as possible and ultimately enjoy a very smooth and cost-effective software development life-cycle. This will be helpful in meeting the title lines very easily and further will never increase the product cost. Things in this case will definitely be under control, and everyone will be able to enjoy the best possible scenario of launching the perfect applications in the market without any element of hassle at any point in time. Hence, things, in this case, will be very much smooth as well as cost-effective at all times because people will be aware of the basics and further will be able to elevate their confidence as well.
